Analytical Platforms Used In TheField Of Metabonomics: A Mini
Review
Mainak Mal
*
*Research Fellow, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge
Road, Singapore 119077.
E-mail:
mainakmal@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Metabonomics involves metabolic profiling of various biomatrices in
response to any diseased condition or genetic modification or due to
effect of environment or lifestyle related factors With its advent, the
field of metabonomics has made valuable contributions and insight to
system biology research. Metabonomicsprovides a powerful tool
complementary to genomics and proteomics and can be used to obtain
valuable information into functional biology, toxicology, pharmacology
and diagnosis of diseases. This mini-review briefly describes the
advantages, disadvantage and applications of the various analytical
platforms used in metabonomics such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
spectroscopy,Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, LC with
ultraviolet or coulometric detection, capillary electrophoresis (CE)
with ultraviolet detection and mass spectrometry (MS) based techniques
like direct infusion MS, gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS),
liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS) or capillary
electrophoresis mass spectrometry (CE/MS).
Keywords:
metabonomics, analytical techniques, NMR, GC/MS, LC/MS
INTRODUCTION
Since its inception the field of metabonomicshas grown remarkably in
terms of its applications and contributions to system biology research.
Metabonomicsprovides a powerful tool for gaining valuable insight into
functional biology, toxicology, pharmacology and diagnosis of diseases.
Metabonomics involves determination of changes in metabolic profiles of
living organisms in response to any diseased condition or genetic
modification or due to effect of environment or lifestyle related
factors [1]. Metabonomicsis complementary to genomics and proteomics as
it measures the perturbed metabolic end-points due to environmental,
pharmacological or pathological influences while in genomics and
proteomics, more upstream biological events are typically profiled and
studied [2]. It involves the analysis of various biological matrices
such as plasma, urine and tissues using suitable analytical platforms.
Metabonomics can be carried out with a global non-targeted approach as
well as with a targeted approach. In targeted metabonomics, alterations
in the levels of a specific class of metabolites or metabolites
belonging to a specific metabolic pathway are ascertained using an
appropriate analytical technique [3]. In global non-targeted
metabonomics, metabolites belonging to diverse metabolic pathways are
profiled. The metabolites that are determined in non- targeted approach
belong to various chemical classes such as organic acids, amino acids,
fatty acids, amines, sugars, sugar alcohols, steroids, nucleic acid
bases and other miscellaneous substances. So, multiple complementary
analytical techniques are often utilized for non-targeted metabonomics
of biological matrices, in order to cover as much of metabolic space as
possible [4].In this mini-review, the different analytical platforms
used in metabonomics as well as their advantages, disadvantage and
applications have been described in a succinct manner.
ANALYTICAL PLATFORMS USED IN METABONOMICS
In an ideal world, an analytical platform for metabonomics should allow
analysis with minimal or no sample preparation, should be high
throughput, highly sensitive and should exhibit high degree of
robustness and reproducibility. Moreover for non-targeted metabonomics,
comprehensive coverage of metabolic space and ease of identification of
profiled metabolites are additional desirable properties of an
analytical platform. Analytical platforms that are commonly used for
metabonomics include nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and
mass spectrometry (MS) based techniques like direct infusion MS, gas
chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS), liquid chromatography mass
spectrometry (LC/MS) or capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry
(CE/MS). In addition to these techniques other methods like Fourier
transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, LC with ultraviolet or
coulometric detection and CE with ultraviolet detection have also been
used for metabonomics. In this section a brief overview of the
different analytical methods used for metabonomics is provided.
1.Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy
NMR spectroscopy possesses many attributes of an ideal platform for
metabonomics such as minimal sample pretreatment, high reproducibility,
robustness, rapid analysis time, non-selectivity (in terms of metabolic
space) and capability of providing detailed structural information
about profiled metabolites. Although NMR spectroscopy is comparatively
less sensitive than MS-based techniques, the availability of cryogenic
NMR probes has improved the sensitivity and throughput of NMR
spectroscopy [5]. An estimate of NMR sensitivity in terms of number of
metabolites measured can be obtained from a recent study in which NMR
was able to measure 49 metabolites in human serum as compared to 96 by
LC/MS and99 by GC/MS [6]. NMR spectroscopy has been utilized
extensively for the metabonomics of liquid biomatrices like body fluids
and tissue extracts. The introduction of high resolution magic angle
spinning NMR (HR-MAS NMR) spectroscopy has extended the applicability
of NMR spectroscopy for metabonomics of solid and semisolid biomatrices
like intact tissue specimens. Proton (1H) NMR spectroscopy
is the dominant technique used for metabonomics. Spectral assignment
and metabolite identification in 1H NMR is quite complicated
and dependent on chemical shifts, relative intensities, signal
multiplicities of the 1H resonances and coupling constants.
Two dimensional 1H NMR spectroscopic methods like
correlation spectroscopy (COSY) and total correlation spectroscopy
(TOCSY) are often utilized for spectral assignment and identification
of metabolites. Apart from 1H, other types of nuclei such as 15N, 13C or 31P can also be exploited
to aid spectral assignment in certain cases. Various NMR pulse
sequences can be utilized to differentiate spectral contributions of
macromolecules (such as proteins and lipoproteins) from those obtained
from low molecular weight metabolites [7].
2. Mass spectrometry (MS) based techniques
MS can be used alone as direct infusion MS or in conjunction with
separation techniques for metabonomics. Direct infusion of liquid
biomatrices or tissue extracts into MS has been used for metabonomics
in some cases. Although it is a high throughput technique, it suffers
from the disadvantage of high matrix effects, as proper sample
preparation steps and chromatographic separation are not involved.
Matrix effect can be defined as the indirect or direct changes or
interference in response due to the presence of unintended analytes
(for analysis) or other interfering substances in the sample. The
limitations become more pronounced in the case of complex and variable
biomatrices like urine and also in the case of isobaric analytes [8].
High resolution, high sensitivity and availability of commercial
libraries for metabolite identification render GC/MS an excellent and
robust platform for the global non-targeted metabonomics of complex
biomatrices. However, GC/MS analysis involves tedious sample
preparation steps as it is necessary to derivatize analytes to reduce
their polarity and increase volatility. This shortcoming is often
tolerated in metabonomic research where the demand for chromatographic
resolution takes priority over the need for the assay to be high
throughput. The advent of two dimensional gas chromatography time of
flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC/TOFMS) has comprehensively enhanced the
metabolic space coverage of conventional GC/MS. Moreover, the
development of softwares packages with deconvolution feature to
differentiate co-eluting chromatographic peaks has facilitated shorter
GC/MS analysis thus improving the throughput of the technique [9].
LC/MS has certain advantages over GC/MS in terms of ease of sample
pretreatment and flexibility in throughput. The applicability of LC/MS
in non-targeted metabonomics is comparatively restricted due to the
constraint in the number of metabolites amenable to analysis. However,
developments in diverse LC column chemistries and chemical
derivatization strategies have enhanced the metabolic space coverage of
LC/MS [10]. Although LC/MS is considered as a suitable analytical
platform for both targeted and non-targeted metabonomics, its
applicability is more established in the case of targeted profiling of
metabolites. This is due the fact that LC/MS can be operated in highly
selective and sensitive mode if desired for targeted analysis. For
non-targeted profiling, LC/MS is generally operated in both positive
and negative electrospray ionization (ESI) modes for the comprehensive
coverage of metabolic space. The emergence of microbore LC/MS and ultra
performance LC (UPLC) systems has improved the resolving capacity,
sensitivity and separation speed of conventional LC/MS [9].
CE/MS has also been used as a platform for metabonomics especially for
profiling low abundance metabolites. The separation mechanism of CE/MS
makes it a suitable platform for analysis of polar, ionisable
metabolites. Another advantage of CE/MS is the small sample volume
needed. Moreover, liquid biomatrices like urine requires minimal sample
preparation steps prior to analysis [11].
3. LC/NMR/MS hybrid techniques
For metabonomics, LC/NMR/MS hybrid platforms can also be utilized. In
such systems the LC eluent is split into two parts and subjected to
concomitant analysis by both NMR and MS. The resulting NMR- and
MS-based data provide in-depth molecular information and aids in
metabolite identification [12]. Emergence of highly sophisticated data
analysis techniques has further facilitated the analysis and
interpretation of LC/NMR/MS hybrid platforms [13]. LC/NMR/MS methods
have shown promise in the discovery of metabolite based markers of
xenobiotic induced renal toxicity and characterization of lipoproteins
in human blood serum. LC/NMR/MS has also been utilized for urinary
metabonomics of pediatric metabolic disorders such as
methylmalonaciduria. It has also been used for the metabonomics of
human amniotic fluid with an aim to diagnose disorders in the mother or
developing fetus [14].
4. Other analytical techniques
Although LC with ultraviolet [15] or coulometric detection [16]and CE
with ultraviolet detection [17] have been explored for metabonomics,
their usage is limited by their inability to identify metabolites
directly. However, in the case of LC with coulometric detection,
libraries of standard compounds can be created on the basis of LC
retention times and redox properties for metabolite identification
[16]. Although FTIR spectroscopy has been explored for metabonomics,
its applicability is very limited as it does not provide sufficient
information to identify metabolites.However, the short analysis time
required per sample (about 5 to 10 s) enables its usage as an optional
tool for screening or group classification or as an adjunct method to
other commonly used analytical platforms [18]. The advantages,
disadvantages and applications of different analytical platforms used
for metabonomics have been summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Advantages, disadvantages and applications of different analytical
platforms used for metabonomics
Analytical Technique
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Applications
|
NMR spectroscopy
|
Involves minimal sample pretreatment
Highly reproducible and robust
High throughput
Non-selective (in terms of metabolic space)
Provides detailed structural information about profiled
metabolites
|
Less sensitive than MS-based techniques
Spectral assignment and metabolite identification is
complicated
|
Metabonomics for xenobiotic toxicity assessment,
different forms of cancer, neurological disorders,
metabolic disorders, aging etc [19].
Intact tissue based metabonomics using solid state
MAS-NMR [5].
|
Direct infusion MS
|
High throughput
|
Suffers from high matrix effect
and isobaric interference
|
Microbial metabonomics studies [8]
|
GC/MS
|
High resolution and sensitivity Availability of EI
spectra-based commercial libraries for metabolite
identification
Not susceptible to matrix effect
|
Involves tedious sample preparation
Comparatively low throughput
|
Profiling of volatile metabolites in lung cancer [20]
and skin emissions [21] using headspace GC/MS.
Metabonomics for validating animal models of diseases
[22], xenobiotic toxicity assessment [23], different
forms of cancer [24], metabolic disorders [25],
neurological disorders [26].
|
Table 1.
Advantages, disadvantages and applications of different analytical
platforms used for metabonomics(Continued).
Analytical Technique
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Applications
|
LC/MS
|
Ease of sample pretreatment as compared to GC/MS
Allows flexibility in throughput
Highly suitable for targeted profiling
|
Susceptible to matrix effect
Non-availability of EI spectra-based commercial
libraries for easy metabolite identification
|
Metabonomics for xenobiotic metabolism and toxicity
assessment [20], different forms of cancer [27],
metabolic disorders [28], neurological disorders [29].
|
CE/MS
|
Liquid biomatrices like urine requires minimal sample
preparation
Requires small sample volume
|
Metabolic space coverage restricted to polar, ionisable
metabolites
|
Microbial metabonomics and as a complementary platform
to GC/MS or LC/MS for metabonomics of diseases [9].
|
LC/NMR/MS
|
Provides in-depth molecular information
Combination of NMR and MS aids in metabolite
identification
|
Highly expensive instrumentation
|
Metabonomics for metabolic disorders [30] and human
amniotic fluid [14].
|
FTIR spectroscopy
|
High throughput
|
Applicability is limited as it does not provide
sufficient information to identify metabolites
|
Microbial metabonomics, metabonomics for cancer and
other diseases [8].
|
CE or LC with UV or coulometric detection
|
Comparatively inexpensive
|
Application limited due to inability to identify
metabolites readily
Less sensitive and less specific than MS-based
techniques
|
Metabonomics for evaluation of food impact [15], animal
model of diabetes [31], targeted profiling of exogenous
metabolites [16].
|
REFERENCES
[1] J.K. Nicholson, J.C. Lindon, E. Holmes, 'Metabonomics': understanding
the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via
multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data,
Xenobiotica 29 (1999) 1181-1189.
[2] O. Fiehn, Combining genomics, metabolome analysis, and biochemical
modelling to understand metabolic networks, Comp.Funct. Genomics 2 (2001)
155-168.
[3] M. Morris, S.M. Watkins, Focused metabolomic profiling in the drug
development process: advances from lipid profiling,Curr.Opin. Chem. Biol. 9
(2005) 407-412.
[4] J.C. Lindon, J.K. Nicholson, E. Holmes, The handbook of metabonomics
and metabolomics, Elsevier, The Netherlands, 2007.
[5] H.C. Keun, O. Beckonert, J.L. Griffin, C. Richter, D. Moskau, J.C.
Lindon, J.K. Nicholson, Cryogenic probe 13C NMR spectroscopy of urine for
metabonomic studies, Anal. Chem. 74 (2002) 4588-4593.
[6] N. Psychogios, D.D. Hau,J. Peng, A.C. Guo, R. Mandal, S.Bouatra, I.
Sinelnikov, R. Krishnamurthy, R Eisner, B. Gautam, N. Young, J. Xia, C.
Knox, E. Dong, P. Huang,Z. Hollander, T.L. Pedersen, S.R. Smith, F.
Bamforth, R. Greiner, B. McManus, J.W. Newman, T. Goodfriend, D.S. Wishart,
The human serum metabolome,PLoS One 6(2011)e16957.
[7] J.C. Lindon, E. Holmes, J.K. Nicholson, Metabonomics in pharmaceutical
R&D, FEBS J 274(2007)1140-1151.
[8] W.B. Dunn, N.J. Bailey, H.E. Johnson, Measuring the metabolome: current
analytical technologies, Analyst 130(2005) 606-625.
[9] E.M. Lenz,I.D. Wilson, Analytical strategies in metabonomics. J
Proteome Res. 6(2007)443-458.
[10] J.M. Halket, D. Waterman, A.M. Przyborowska,R.K. Patel,P.D. Fraser,
P.M. Bramley, Chemical derivatization and mass spectral libraries in
metabonomics by GC/MS and LC/MS/MS, J Exp. Bot. 56(2005) 219-243.
[11] R. Lee,A.S. Ptolemy,L. Niewczas,P. Britz-McKibbin, Integrative
metabolomics for characterizing unknown low-abundance metabolites by
capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry with computer simulations,
Anal. Chem. 79(2007)403-415.
[12] J.C. Lindon, E. Holmes, M.E. Bollard, E.G. Stanley, J.K.
Nicholson,Metabonomics technologies and their applications in physiological
monitoring, drug safety assessment and disease diagnosis, Biomarkers
9(2004) 1-31.
[13] O. Cloarec, A. Campbell, L.H. Tseng, U. Braumann, M. Spraul, G.
Scarfe, R. Weaver, J.K. Nicholson. Virtual chromatographic resolution
enhancement in cryoflow LC-NMR experiments via statistical total
correlation spectroscopy, Anal. Chem. 79(2007) 3304-3311.
[14] G. Graca, I.F. Duarte,I.M. Carreira, A.B. Couceiro, R. DominguesMdo,
M. Spraul, L.H. Tseng, A.M. Gil, Metabolite profiling of human amniotic
fluid by hyphenated nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Anal. Chem.
80(2008)6085-6092.
[15] H. Pham-Tuan, L. Kaskavelis, C.A. Daykin, H.G. Janssen, Method
development in high-performance liquid chromatography for high-throughput
profiling and metabonomic studies of biofluid samples, J Chromatogr. B
Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 789(2003)283-301.
[16] P.H. Gamache, D.F. Meyer, M.C. Granger, I.N.Acworth, Metabolomic
applications of electrochemistry/mass spectrometry, J Am. Soc. Mass.
Spectrom. 15 (2004) 1717-1726.
[17] S. Zomer, C. Guillo, R.G. Brereton, M. Hanna-Brown, Toxicological
classification of urine samples using pattern recognition techniques and
capillary electrophoresis, Anal.Bioanal. Chem. 378(2004) 2008-2020.
[18] C. Leon, I. Rodriguez-Meizoso, M. Lucio, V. Garcia-Canas, E. Ibanez,
P. Schmitt-Kopplin, A. Cifuentes. Metabolomics of transgenic maize
combining Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance-mass spectrometry,
capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry and pressurized liquid
extraction, J Chromatogr. A 1216(2009)7314-7323.
[19] M. Coen, E. Holmes, J.C. Lindon, J.K. Nicholson, NMR-based
metabonomics and metabonomic approaches to problems in molecular
toxicology, Chem. Res.Toxicol. 21(2008) 9-27.
[20] C. Chen, F.J. Gonzalez, J.R. Idle, LC-MS-based metabolomics in drug
metabolism, Drug.Metab. Rev. 39(2007) 581-597.
[21] M. Gallagher, C.J. Wysocki, J.J. Leyden, A.I. Spielman, X. Sun, G.
Preti, Analyses of volatile organic compounds from human skin, Br. J
Dermatol. 159(2008) 780-791.
[22] K.L. Chang, L.S. New, M. Mal, C.W. Goh, C.C. Aw, E.R. Browne, E.C.
Chan,Metabonomics of 3-nitropropionic acid early-stage Huntington's disease
rat model using gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry, J
Proteome Res. 10(2011) 2079-2087.
[23] K.J. Boudonck, M.W. Mitchell, L. Nemet, L. Keresztes, A. Nyska, D.
Shinar, M. Rosenstock, Discovery of metabolomics biomarkers for early
detection of nephrotoxicity, Toxicol. Pathol. 37 (2009) 280-292.
[24] C. Denkert, J.Budczies, W. Weichert, G. Wohlgemuth, M. Scholz, T.
Kind, S. Niesporek, A. Noske, A. Buckendahl, M. Dietel, O. Fiehn,
Metabolite profiling of human colon carcinoma--deregulation of TCA cycle
and amino acid turnover, Mol. Cancer 7 (2008) 72.
[25] Y. Bao, T. Zhao, X. Wang, Y.Qiu, M. Su, W. Jia, Metabonomic variations
in the drug-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and healthy
volunteers, J Proteome Res. 8(2009)1623-1630.
[26] B.R. Underwood, D. Broadhurst, W.B. Dunn, D.I. Ellis, A.W. Michell, C.
Vacher, D.E. Mosedale, D.B. Kell, R.A. Barker, D.J. Grainger, D.C.
Rubinsztein, Huntington disease patients and transgenic mice have similar
pro-catabolic serum metabolite profiles, Brain 129(2006)877-886.
[27] E.S. Ong, L. Zou, S. Li, P.Y. Cheah,K.W. Eu, C.N. Ong,Metabonomics in
colorectal cancer reveals signature metabolic shifts during tumorigenesis,
Mol. Cell Proteomics (2010).
[28] C. Wang, H. Kong, Y. Guan, J. Yang, J. Gu, S. Yang, G. Xu, Plasma
phospholipid metabonomics and biomarkers of type 2 diabetes mellitus based
on high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray mass spectrometry
and multivariate statistical analysis, Anal. Chem. 77(2005) 4108-4116.
[29] N.J. Li, W.T. Liu, W. Li, S.Q. Li, X.H. Chen, K.S. Bi, P. He, Plasma
metabonomics of Alzheimer's disease by liquid chromatography/mass
spectrometry, Clin.Biochem. 43(2010)992-997.
[30] G. Zurek, B. Schneider, T. Zey, J. Shockcor, M. Spraul, C. Baessmann,
Hyphenated LC-NMR/MS for the characterization of complex metabolic profiles
and biomarker discovery in biofluids, 8th Conference of the Israel
Analytical Chemistry Society, Jan 11-12 (2005).
[31] C. Barbas, E.P. Moraes, A. Villasenor. Capillary electrophoresis as a
metabolomics tool for non-targeted fingerprinting of biological samples, J
Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 55(2011)823-831.